ANWR video compilations - By ANWR Videos

Bush: ANWR Drilling Is Solution to High Gas Prices
Posted by: Veracifier

Video duration: 302 seconds
Global video hits: 11797

April 29, 2008

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Hmmm... Seem's ...
By: gtrgyro333. on 29 Oct 08, 03:09:10
Hmmm... Seem's Kentan Citizen Obama Is Going To Have A Little Problem...SURPRISE....

The definition of ...
By: arkybarky. on 09 Oct 08, 07:08:07
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. vote on November 4, 2008 for Obama & Biden!!!

It's just the most ...
By: BoyKagome. on 20 Sep 08, 21:45:47
It's just the most ironic thing, and it shows all liberals care about is blaming other people and making them miserable. What have they been saying? They want Bush to do something about gas prices; Bush does something about gas prices and lets read what the libs are saying. " It wont do anything." " Thats not the way to do it." "Hes the one that wants the prices up." All of which is proved wrong in this vid, but libs like to live in a fantasy world where things they dont like never happen.

lol its funny how ...
By: dussuh. on 19 Sep 08, 16:00:11
lol its funny how the americans at first blamed the arabs. What's happening in the oil market is due to the mismanagement of the U.S. economy. Everyone with common sense knows it. American oil companies are making huge 125% profit increases over the backs of americans.

dumbass of the world
By: amilatubes. on 16 Sep 08, 17:08:56
dumbass of the world

The Republican ...
By: Hermansvague. on 31 Aug 08, 21:38:35
The Republican agenda on drilling is not to use it as a solution. They treat it as the only solution and block other solutions. They are at least every bit as much to blame. This is their newest divide and conquer tactic on the American people like taking the Westboro Church position on gay people 4 years ago.

If he did, the ...
By: BoyKagome. on 19 Aug 08, 06:12:41
If he did, the liberal media wouldn't broad cast it... so guess we cant know for sure now can we?

Is it your opinion, ...
By: chefrick03. on 18 Aug 08, 21:52:19
Is it your opinion, then, that N.Korea is a more liberal nation, or a more conservative one? Is China a more liberal nation, or a more conservative one? What about Cuba? Then, leave communism aside for a second, and just look at the bad guys in general. Look at Iran. Conservative, or liberal? Libia? Saudi Arabia? The friggen Congo? Are the bad guys running nations that are more conservative, or more liberal? Oh, I see that I have replied to you once already. Well, here, eat another one.

what else could ...
By: oaklynlen. on 03 Aug 08, 22:33:58
what else could schrub say. HE'S AN OIL MAN. SO'S BALDY. THE G.O.P. APPEALS SIMPLY TO THE SELFISHNESS, GREED, SELF-SERVING AND SPOILED ATTITUDES OF MOST AMERICANS. has he ever mentioned sacrifice for the common good. or conserve. or carpooling, taking public transportation & suburban trains,riding amtrak instead of flying, and driving at 55m.p.h. to save gas or lives?

I never said that ...
By: RayBoylan. on 01 Aug 08, 04:25:31
I never said that he had any connection with them, just that he says the name like Harry Belafont would sing it "Come Mr. Tal-Lee-Bahn tally me banana LOL I agree about the cheap labor - war on terror with no border security is nonsense. Pay decent wages here, and let Americans have those jobs. McCain should realize any time you are on the same side of an issue as Ted Kennedy and GWB you are WRONG WRONG WRONG

Now you're talking ...
By: Bullettube. on 01 Aug 08, 02:33:44
Now you're talking through your hat! Obama has no connection with the Taliban. The Bush family on the other hand are long time friends of Osama Bin Laden's father. The Republicans don't want to stop the immigration of cheap labor that their corporate buddies need.

Ok, you have the ...
By: Bullettube. on 01 Aug 08, 02:30:39
Ok, you have the right to rant, but we have the right to demand factual proof of your claims. Regan doubled FICA, Bush #43 increased income taxes, and a family of four with an income under 41k is in deep mud already because of Bush. So what is your solution?

This question was ...
By: Bullettube. on 01 Aug 08, 02:26:44
This question was asked of my 11th grade Civics class back in 1966. Technically, GW Bush could be VP because there is nothing in the Constitution that forbids if. On the other hand, with Cheney as the real power behind Bush, what would be the difference?

Every time Bush ...
By: Bullettube. on 01 Aug 08, 02:23:49
Every time Bush threatened Iran, the price of oil went up. Now that it has been revealed that 3rd level Sate dept. officials have been talking to Iranian officials, tensions in the commodities markets have eased and gas prices have come down. This began to happen last week, before Bush's announcement on ANWR.

that's a good ...
By: drummer703. on 31 Jul 08, 18:10:30
that's a good question. but since he was elected twice, that might prevent him from doing so. im not sure.

If he really wants ...
By: chefrick03. on 29 Jul 08, 19:38:41
If he really wants to loose the election, hey I'm all for it.

Oh look gas prices ...
By: BoyKagome. on 27 Jul 08, 10:54:50
Oh look gas prices went down when Bush made this speech. Guess democrats will have a hard time showing this" Bush just wants high gas prices" crap now. Too bad you didn't get to see their real face until it was so late in, but that's Bush's fault for trying to work with them instead of against them. There is no compromise when it comes to a lib, all they know how to do is take away money from those that stimulate the econimy, and give it to those who dont. Nice work W!

Can John Mc Cain ...
By: onetrickpony420. on 27 Jul 08, 03:57:18
Can John Mc Cain Pick GWB As Vice President??

Do you say anything ...
By: chefrick03. on 26 Jul 08, 16:50:36
Do you say anything that you thought up yourself?

The Tal-Lee-Bahn ( ...
By: RayBoylan. on 22 Jul 08, 20:07:00
The Tal-Lee-Bahn (as the "Chosen One" calls them - in his best Belafonte) will know they have a friend at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The borders will remain open, with health care and education being paid for all.(Give me your tired, your poor, your undocumented yearning to breathe free. And sometimes killing a few citizens - small price to pay for sanctuary cities. Yep you ain't seen nothing yet - The Reverand Wrong said "God Damn America!" This is just his prayers being answered

It's OK Tag - Come ...
By: RayBoylan. on 22 Jul 08, 20:06:38
It's OK Tag - Come NOV 5th, when we awaken from this catastrophe and "Chosen One" has the Presidency in his post-racial, new world order fist, this will all seem like "the good old days": FICA will increase 100%, top taxes will go from 35% to 39%, the Capital Gains tax will balloon, But fear not! B. Hussein Obama is only after the fat cats - by the way, fat cats start at $41K a year apparently.

OIL Corps have 60+ ...
By: CORPARANOID. on 17 Jul 08, 04:05:40
OIL Corps have 60+Mill Acres w/18Bill we Gave THEM B4 &CORPs want ANWAR 4shale/oil/ gas that $aveWhat 1-2cents &Co$ts uWHAT! Go GREEN &become self-sufficent at community/town city /state levels &get GOV outOF $elling USdown the pipe2CHINA!!! Get the FACTS-This is NOT for US! IRAQ was NOT 4 US! It's GOV/Corp Monopoly 4makingTHEM MONEY & GettingCONTROL over OUR Natural Resources. Go Green, invest in Local GreenCo's: Solar, Wind, Water. US Reduced Consumption by 5Mil BarrelsLASTYr! &15Mil THIS Yr!

Sorry, but this is ...
By: ktkof04. on 16 Jul 08, 06:07:40
Sorry, but this is not a correct title, he never said it was the Solution to high gas prices, he said it would likely lower them. Despite GWB's horrible speech skills, Drilling in ANWR years ago would help the supply and speculation problems going on today. However, this is being blocked by the same people who blocked it years ago... whose blaming them?

you know that oil ...
By: Liquidgecko83. on 16 Jul 08, 02:59:46
you know that oil will not make into the market for atleast 4 years! what a douche!

You mean how many ...
By: BoyKagome. on 16 Jul 08, 01:54:44
You mean how many oil buddys Clinton News Network tells you he has? If the was 50% liberal and conservative news the liberal ideas would be reduced to a college class room as "things you never want your country to become." I can site over 20 cases off the top of my head how this congress has kept you from cheaper fuel, and non on Bush. Bush is the one fighting for it, your liberals are the ones blocking it. Learn to think instead of listen to a news station who wants mindless zombies.

ANWR v. NPR-A Pt 1
Posted by: gerkins1

Video duration: 603 seconds
Global video hits: 375

While Obama wises up on Oil, he misses the point. You can go up the Alaska Pipeline and turn left or turn right. He turns left towards NPR-A. He should haved turned right towards ANWR.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Rep Don Young Urges Producing American Energy & Opening ANWR
Posted by: RepDonYoung

Video duration: 306 seconds
Global video hits: 946133

Congressman Don Young urges the opening of ANWR and the development of American Energy Sources. His bill, HR 6107, the American Energy Independence and Price Reduction Act, would open ANWR and use the approximately $200 billion in federal revenue generated to develop Alternative Energy sources

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Right on! DRILL, ...
By: MarineLlanoTX. on 17 Oct 08, 04:16:38
Right on! DRILL, BABY, DRILL! RIGHT NOW! We MUST get America FREE of foreign oil and KEEP IT FREE! Semper Fi! :)

Right on! DRILL, ...
By: MarineLlanoTX. on 17 Oct 08, 02:13:23
Right on! DRILL, BABY, DRILL! RIGHT NOW! We MUST get America FREE of foreign oil and KEEP IT FREE! Semper Fi! :)

Drill Baby, Drill!
By: zplnfan. on 13 Oct 08, 15:08:16
Drill Baby, Drill!

EXACTLY right!
By: FREEDOMLVR7. on 13 Oct 08, 10:58:54
EXACTLY right!

Lindsey Williams ...
By: aBookADay. on 09 Oct 08, 21:00:08
Lindsey Williams said the reason we don't get oil out of ANwar is because Henry Kissinger made a deal with the Arabs in the 1970s that we would buy their oil and not develop our own (the USA's). Clinton seems to be at the bottom of so many problems. The Glass Steagall repeal for the international bankers. The stopping of drilling at Anwar. The real reason is not technical. The real reason is in the dark politics of the USA and the international bankers who own the oil companies.

Hats off to Don ...
By: 710britt. on 09 Oct 08, 14:05:07
Hats off to Don Young.Congress for the most part is inept

Hats off to Don ...
By: 710britt. on 09 Oct 08, 13:58:43
Hats off to Don Young,The politicians that are against drilling can kiss my crude ass.

I am puzzled by ...
By: OLDWISEANDCURIOUS. on 08 Oct 08, 02:34:40
I am puzzled by many of these responses in our posts. Drill here. Drill now. Just do it.

Our elected ...
By: belvidereslim. on 07 Oct 08, 11:19:34
Our elected officails need to be accountable for there actions. When Clinton vetoed the bill to drill in anwr,13 years. Our national security was compromised. In my opinion that is treason. america is asleep at the wheel. Wkae up!

lazy cork sucking ...
By: marshmelow. on 06 Oct 08, 11:37:38
lazy cork sucking bastidges. It's easy to spend tax payers money for war and for oil from over seas. These congress scum get paid every week by tax payers money, and that's all they care about.

so very true, the ...
By: carvajulio. on 06 Oct 08, 09:14:04
so very true, the truth hurts. america fucked it self by doing nothing 30 years ago, it became a nation of power and greed, know it will fall real fast!

$1 TRILLION is what ...
By: 2007realitycheck. on 02 Oct 08, 20:23:20
$1 TRILLION is what the ANWR oil is worth at $100/barrel. It also represents about 20,000 union jobs. Think we could use that savings and cash infusion now?

Drilling will solve ...
By: redwhiteandblues. on 01 Oct 08, 14:21:08
Drilling will solve the short term problem. Bush and the Republicans are not the problem the problem are out of touch Democrats and Obama and gang. The energy solution is simple drill drill drill and also do the alternative throw everything at the energy situation and do it now. Vote against all DEMOCRATS who have gotten us in this situation and the mortgage problem and will not get us out either they will tax us and create more government and no drilling - is that the change you want?

Yes we need to ...
By: mlp633. on 01 Oct 08, 00:48:45
Yes we need to drill in anwar and off the coast of alaska and east coast...WE have plenty of oil that will last us for 100 years and we need to start drilling for it instead of importing oil from our enemies. Maybe the airhead will actually learn something eventually and make the right decisions...Right now she isnt making too much sense.

When you have those ...
By: rickinnev. on 30 Sep 08, 20:12:36
When you have those California freaks doing that kind of crap it hurts all our wallets because of the enviromental terrorists you harbor in your state..along with the anti-American freaks in San Franciso.

If we don't get ...
By: januaryduo. on 30 Sep 08, 19:00:46
If we don't get started drilling, the Russians (who may have already started) will be tapping into it illegally. They are only a stone's throw away........

BFT somebody stood ...
By: jjsparks1948. on 30 Sep 08, 15:53:07
BFT somebody stood up told the truth.....WAKE UP AMERICA!!! Foreign countries are drilling just 50 miles off the pan handle of Florida.....BUT THE US CAN'T!!!

vote the lefties ...
By: jlbcalif. on 27 Sep 08, 19:46:20
vote the lefties out... THAT SIMPLE !!

I LOVE SARAH PALIN! ...
By: don359. on 27 Sep 08, 17:01:17
I LOVE SARAH PALIN!!! SHE SAYS DRILL BABY DRILL!!!! I SAY DRILL BABY DRILL!!!! This guy ROCKS!!! I love him! He is sooooo correct!!!! Someday we will figure out alternative methods of creating energy to move the nation but for now, WE NEED ANWR AND, OFF SURE DRILLING!!! DRILL BABY DRILL!!!

Drill Here and ...
By: FLHTP07. on 27 Sep 08, 04:31:25
Drill Here and Drill Now. Screw Pelosi and Reid.And all the other dimwits.

new refineries ...
By: coldwater71. on 25 Sep 08, 21:10:51
new refineries people, not new drilling.

drilling in ANWAR ...
By: coldwater71. on 25 Sep 08, 20:49:57
drilling in ANWAR is not going to do anything to help us this year or next year or next year or next year or next year or next year or next year or next year. Putting up a solar panel will give you electricity in 30 seconds. Honda has already come out with a CIVIC that runs better, cleaner on natural gas. REP YOUNG is not giving us any REAL solutions for NOW.

why can ford make a ...
By: coldwater71. on 25 Sep 08, 20:46:58
why can ford make a festiva in europe that gets 64mpg but can't give us one here?

the only way to put ...
By: coldwater71. on 25 Sep 08, 20:21:23
the only way to put an end to fuel prices now is to pass a bill regulating billion dollar profits of oil companies. more drilling is not gonna do it. New refineries built will help, but still not a short term fix. This congressman should be introducing a bill that regulates an oil company's profits. Any company making 7 billion a quarter while pinching the american people into poverty should have to answer for their deeds -with *GASP* gov't regulation.

last time we cut ...
By: coldwater71. on 25 Sep 08, 19:59:44
last time we cut off japan from the supply of our alaskan-drilled oil to keep for ourselves, they bombed pearl harbor. I am sure americans are ready for another 9-11 over oil.

McCain talks about drilling in ANWR
Posted by: switherbee

Video duration: 79 seconds
Global video hits: 5857

John McCain clears up his position about drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Portsmouth NH.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

The spot that they ...
By: JOEYCRAXMAN. on 02 Nov 08, 03:22:28
The spot that they are drilling on is just a gigantic slab of dirty ice with no vegetation and barely any animal population. For crying out loud its not like they are drilling in the middle of a forest.

because democrats ...
By: ktkof04. on 16 Jul 08, 05:53:12
because democrats said that it wouldnt create any oil for ten years so it wouldnt matter.... oh wait that would be a little helpful now wouldnt it? ... why yes it would.

LAWL!
By: Squallleonheartfan. on 12 Jul 08, 11:39:52
LAWL!

I think they should ...
By: rchelifreak. on 06 Jul 08, 04:43:28
I think they should drill for oil up McCain's ass!

We need to drill in ...
By: gcsecsi. on 29 Jun 08, 18:34:03
We need to drill in ANWR and any other area with oil. If refineries are needed, they should be built as well. Free markets will work on alternate fuels, not the government, its not the governments job! Alternate fuels would be highly profitable, free markets are all over it. The liberals will crush our free markets, destroy an ill economy and bring Americans to their knees with their ignorant ideology. Then they can feel in control, their Jimmy Carter walk to work mentality would destroy us.

Right on Dude! only ...
By: quaheedus. on 27 Jun 08, 22:13:45
Right on Dude! only 20 and full of common sense and love great music. An intelligent Metal head! or a as I call them and myself a RockinRepublican!

why are so many ...
By: rosieisahippo. on 27 Jun 08, 20:53:47
why are so many republicans such radical left liberals?

at a testicle per ...
By: rosieisahippo. on 27 Jun 08, 20:51:09
at a testicle per gallon this is really fucked

run your cars on ...
By: rosieisahippo. on 27 Jun 08, 20:50:05
run your cars on hippie blood i say

Oh what a hippie ...
By: rosieisahippo. on 27 Jun 08, 20:47:57
Oh what a hippie pussy gay dickhole liberal fag-o-crat.

"With respect to ...
By: Diskwin. on 27 Jun 08, 07:05:12
"With respect to the world oil price impact, projected ANWR oil production constitutes between 0.4 and 1.2 percent of total world oil consumption in 2030, based on the low and high resource cases, respectively.1 Consequently, ANWR oil production is not projected to have a large impact on world oil prices." tinyurl 45oo56

Obama and McCain ...
By: gsuitter. on 25 Jun 08, 16:41:04
Obama and McCain are pretty much bed buddies on this issue as they are on many issues. For common sense policies please check out Libertarian candidate Bob Barr. He may not win but a vote for Barr will tell the establishment, left and right, we're not going to take it any more.

We invaded a ...
By: joe0035. on 21 Jun 08, 05:34:04
We invaded a country full of oil and spend billions securing it! There is no oil shortage. Oil companies weren't smart enough to realize current demand so they didn't build enough refineries. Can we be so gullible? If they drill on our reserves and off our shores we need a guarantee that we will pay under $1 a gallon at the pumps or it shouldn't be allowed. Our land our oil our terms don't let government give up what belongs to us. We're getting manipulated in giving up something for nothing!

Evil Republican ...
By: philh37. on 20 Jun 08, 16:43:18
Evil Republican McCain once again calls for domestic drilling. And once again the democrats are saying the same thing they did in 1996 when president Clinton vetoed drilling in ANWR. "Well... even if we made the decision to start drilling, it would take 10 years to realize any benefit.

ok... so who's ...
By: claudius1964. on 19 Jun 08, 02:48:06
ok... so who's hording oil in this country... come on... spill the beans.

Not very many ...
By: DimeLivesInUs. on 13 Jun 08, 00:47:42
Not very many people go to ANWR, what's the point in keeping it beautiful for animals and super rich people?

5 years is enough ...
By: DimeLivesInUs. on 13 Jun 08, 00:46:24
5 years is enough to research cleaner, efficient, and abundant fuels. Actually, if we used ANWR oil on a 4.3Billion barrel estimate to replace all oil we get from Saudi Arabia, it would last us 8.9 years.

Hmm.. I don't ...
By: SaMeJ28. on 11 Jun 08, 18:22:02
Hmm.. I don't understand why you're fighting to open ANWR... You said yourself that there's 36 Billion barrels there... but the US oil consumption is 20 million/per day. At that rate, those reserves would be deplete in only 5 years. ...Then what?

It may not be a ...
By: andrew144alk. on 11 Jun 08, 05:55:58
It may not be a large area but it is a micro climate of biodiversity. Very important to protect. Most of Alaska is mountains where no to little life can life. ANWR is a thriving ecosystem that future generations should have the right to knowing something that wild is still in tact.

I'm voting McCain ...
By: Joelomite. on 08 Jun 08, 04:31:03
I'm voting McCain over Obama, but hearing this really frustrates me. McCain and others don't realize that the drillig space in ANWR takes up only 2000 acres, and Alaska is millions of acres. It's just a blip on the radar. We have a HUGE abundance of untapped oil in places like: the Dakotas, coast of California, Gulf of Mexico, off the Florida Keys, Virgina to name a few. China's allowed to drill here, but it's illegal for us to drill in our own backyard??? It's time to change the rules.

Why didn't they do ...
By: Dblitzen. on 07 Jun 08, 14:36:46
Why didn't they do this 10 years ago?????

Mccain is insane
By: overpaidrockstar1. on 07 Jun 08, 04:20:51
Mccain is insane

Last week the ...
By: nigglefritz. on 28 May 08, 22:13:06
Last week the Department of Energy released its report on drilling in ANWR. It says it would take 10 years to bring the oil online, AND it would reduce the price of crude by $0.75 per barrel. With a barrel selling for $133 today, that isn't worth it. Not even close. We need alternatives to petroleum based energy. Also, just same NO to McW in 2008! We don't want more of Bush's failed policies!

Way to go M! Chris ...
By: CoolPlanet2. on 11 Dec 07, 23:10:55
Way to go M! Chris and Heather

The girl asking the ...
By: jmbaUtube. on 11 Dec 07, 22:25:03
The girl asking the question is Emily Bowers. I am pretty proud of her, since I am her father. Joel

$Hannity\$

Hannity's America - The Real ANWR with Rep. Nunes
Posted by: ahouse3

Video duration: 321 seconds
Global video hits: 1804

ANWR holds the key to billions of barrels of oil - enough to end our dependence on Suadi Arabia for 30 years. However, thanks to radical environmentalists, the American public believes drilling in ANWR will have a negative impact on the environment.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

ANWR Reality
Posted by: Kate53WI

Video duration: 223 seconds
Global video hits: 121

Fox News, Jim Angle reports on the reality of ANWR.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

ANWR in 2050 part II
Posted by: jpwade1

Video duration: 171 seconds
Global video hits: 878

Converting Oil Wells to Methane Hydrate Production Wells & Future of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - ANWR
Review the GIS data in Google Earth
http://www.czmart in.com/jpw/projects. asp
by: jpwade

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Jay Leno on Oil Drilling in ANWR
Posted by: TheFoundryBlog

Video duration: 17 seconds
Global video hits: 74477

Jay Leno chides Democrats for blocking oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. ("The Tonight Show," May 1, 2008)

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Do you drive an ...
By: EricTokar. on 02 Nov 08, 03:15:00
Do you drive an American car made in Mexico, or a japanese car made in America?

Destructive ...
By: snoot87. on 21 Oct 08, 21:49:21
Destructive lifestyle? go back to the 60's PINKO

.... yes, as you ...
By: kappaluppa. on 02 Oct 08, 01:04:38
.... yes, as you are on the internet, using a computer, soaking up the electricity....

Peace Love Dope, ...
By: CaptRon1913. on 24 Sep 08, 14:59:37
Peace Love Dope, get outta Nam

Maybe we should ...
By: DeathEaterLola. on 19 Sep 08, 01:47:29
Maybe we should drill oil in Jay Leno's chin.

We are going the ...
By: MarieDevine. on 14 Aug 08, 23:42:35
We are going the wrong way. More oil means continuing the destructive lifestyle of manufacturing, processing, packaging, and transporting that causes world problems of pollution, energy-food crisis, wars, diseases, immigration, and social security. The Solution: The goal in life is not employment; that creates the problems. The goal is retirement in a garden paradise we create in our neighborhoods for abundant life for all. Leviticus 26: rain in due season, the promise of God to faithful.

Everyone who thinks ...
By: NTW64. on 12 Aug 08, 03:01:40
Everyone who thinks more air in the tires will make more of a differance over drilling our land for oil heres an idea. Keep giving your money to terrorist and let the rest of America keep our dollar here supporting jobs for Americans buy us using oil produced and refined here buy Americans... Oh yeah, take your Prius and go to hell. I also drive American cars...

my wife says you ...
By: DaRatfink. on 11 Aug 08, 22:39:58
my wife says you are full of *%#@.

You are 100% ...
By: DaRatfink. on 11 Aug 08, 22:34:56
You are 100% correct, The price oil is traded at is mainly set by the market on the last trading day of a commodities contract. But Like I said before 90% of the oil isn't even traded. They are letting peoples fear drive prices up and they can then justify selling the rest of their oil at these outrageous prices. I'd bet that if everybody outside of the industry quite trading oil, the price would drop. Market prices nowadays are commonly driven by fear instead of competition.

2/3 of americans ...
By: Xucalfer. on 11 Aug 08, 20:58:03
2/3 of americans already inflate their tires, and ANWR oil doesn't have to go on the Global Market.

Oil prices are set ...
By: yeahlikewhatever. on 10 Aug 08, 04:40:48
Oil prices are set on the open market, not by the oil industry.

You guys seem to be ...
By: DaRatfink. on 10 Aug 08, 03:42:12
You guys seem to be forgetting that oil and fuel prices aren't necessarily set by supply and demand- that only happens in a free market. Chew on this for a while- less than 10% of all oil is traded on the open market. Why should it be? Why would a company drill it, pump it, sell it, then have to buy it back again to refine and then market it?

"Fuel prices will ...
By: yeahlikewhatever. on 09 Aug 08, 14:44:00
"Fuel prices will not change and actually get worst [sic] because the prices are set through the global market" Alaskan fuel derived from Alaskan oil is all consumed here in the U.S. The price of oil on the world market will continue to be high, mostly because the world supply of oil is declining (passed "peak oil") and demand from India and China will continue to rise. So if 7-11 percent is "too much profit" how about taxing every company that makes such "excess profits"?

I never called you ...
By: yeahlikewhatever. on 09 Aug 08, 14:35:09
I never called you a name, I said you have a naive, shallow-minded position. I don't know if you are naive and shallow-minded regarding other subjects. Our country runs on coal, at least most of the power plants do, and so absolutely are "part of the discussion" since coal is not "renewable green tech" by your definition. Oil company execs say at least three years. But when Bush announced rescinding the offshore drilling exec. order, prices dropped instantly.

Just about all ...
By: qc3linux. on 09 Aug 08, 13:39:47
Just about all steel mills are coal driven, which is still outside of the scope of this discussion. The basics are that even if we where to allow the drilling we are going to lose so much more than if we dont. Fuel prices will not change and actually get worst because the prices are set through the global market, and the time frame it would take to get a drop in anyone's tank is at least 6 years. Either way I am done with continuing this discussion. Since I am the only one not name calling.

LOL So how many ...
By: yeahlikewhatever. on 09 Aug 08, 05:30:31
LOL So how many steel mills are going to run on windmills or solar cells? "Worldly based" -- are you a luddite? The 10 percent is actually high, it's 7-11 percent. The oil companies pay the government much more than that in taxes. The government makes money off the oil companies by leasing them land. The oil companies WORK for the profits they make, the government does nothing but raid the coffers, just as they will tax profits from low energy yielding windmills and solar cells.

Bush Sr. was the ...
By: particle409. on 08 Aug 08, 20:31:05
Bush Sr. was the first to deny drilling in ANWR. Also, prices rose independently of the supply/demand chain.

Oil is a global ...
By: particle409. on 08 Aug 08, 20:29:30
Oil is a global commodity. Whatever we drill will go right into the international market. ANWR would boost global supply by less than half a percent. In about a decade. A drop of 2-3 cents, and not for at LEAST 10 years. We'd be better off with a massive campaign to get people to inflate their tires. Seriously, we could see a 3-4% savings on that, as opposed to less than half a percent.

Ok lets get " ...
By: qc3linux. on 08 Aug 08, 14:26:04
Ok lets get "renewable green tech" defined - not nuclear, biofuels, or anything other than completely worldly based, ie solar, wind, thermal, and wave to name a few. You can't really have a creditable argument by name calling the counterargument. With your argument that there 10 percent profit is based purely on the oil companies giving you such information. The fact is that government pays most of search and drilling with tax relief which makes the oil companies more.

That's a naive, ...
By: yeahlikewhatever. on 07 Aug 08, 04:51:09
That's a naive, shallow-minded position -- the oil companies paid three times as much in taxes last year as they made in profit. Their profits were, percentage-wise, less than 10 percent, much of which they must put into drilling and searching for new sources of oil. So in your mind, how much PERCENTAGE profit is too much? Does your "renewable green tech" include nuclear power?

By the way we could ...
By: qc3linux. on 06 Aug 08, 17:12:15
By the way we could have at least 20 or more solar power plants within 2 years, where as it takes the minimum of 6 to 8 years before there would be a drop of the ANWR or OCS oil in anyone's tanks. Then we would still have to export the oil for refinement.

I would have to say ...
By: qc3linux. on 06 Aug 08, 17:09:46
I would have to say that if anyone is really looking at the possibility of allowing the USA to drill for oil within the regions of ANWR and the OCS, they should look into renewables; because if there was just half of the tax relief that is given to oil companies than all Americans would be able and willing to buy new cars that are plug-in hybrids. Then we can build and produce electricity from renewable green tech that is present to run more from the grid and off oil.

Nice one Jay. Keep ...
By: YawnXen. on 06 Aug 08, 05:33:35
Nice one Jay. Keep the jokes coming. I'll miss you when you retire.

I know we don't get ...
By: ifyourscaredsayur. on 06 Aug 08, 03:40:46
I know we don't get oil from Iran!Butlast week when the news came out from Israel that Olmert had finally resigned & Israel Defense Minister had harsh words for Iran.Oil went up over $5 that day.We give 700 billion a year to other countrie's for oil a year!Pelosi wants to drain our strategic reserve thats Brilliant!We have 70 years of reserves in&around the U.SWe could do it all drill,solar,wind,research &higher standards!It will take a long time to do all that stuff but,drilling 1 1/2 to 6yrs.

We don't get oil ...
By: dcrum35. on 06 Aug 08, 02:23:19
We don't get oil from Iran. Most of our foreign oil comes from Canada and and South and Central America. We only get 11% from the entire middle east... which is still too high.

Rep. Young Discusses ANWR on the Fox Business Channel
Posted by: RepDonYoung

Video duration: 600 seconds
Global video hits: 1746

Rep. Don Young discusses the need for drilling in ANWR on the Fox Business Channel

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Sen. Ted Stevens (R) Alaska - ANWR Testimony
Posted by: Lampropeltis001

Video duration: 76 seconds
Global video hits: 5705

Good old Ted Stevens at it again. This time the old bag-o-shit talks about drilling ANWR with a bloodlust!

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

if it were back in ...
By: mudstompaz. on 18 Nov 08, 01:01:11
if it were back in the days id challenge him to a breakdance.

A month or so ago, ...
By: Taranau. on 24 Oct 08, 15:29:09
A month or so ago,several news sources were pointing out that the oil companies own 38,000,000 acres of land.And,that didn't include any of their leases.Things work differently in Alaska,it would seem,but here in the Lower 48,the oil companies do own a lot of land.The oil companies were pointing out that,refineries and storage areas are included in that acreage.And that not all of it has oil underneath it.Some of it has shale and/or coal.Some of it is just open land they hope to develop.

They don't own any ...
By: roydavidcraft. on 24 Oct 08, 14:21:46
They don't own any of the land they drill on. The land is owned by Alaska or the Feds, and is leased to these companies. Oh and very few if any of those pictures shown in this video are in ANWAR.

wow, that guy ...
By: Plomomedia. on 04 Oct 08, 04:23:10
wow, that guy sounds like a real dick.

I think his point ...
By: deathangel2313. on 30 Sep 08, 14:28:33
I think his point was that the oil companies should be all out of oil on their own land,before drilling in the national reserves.The national reserves are supposed to be our last resorts,not our first pickings.

All Alaskans,or ...
By: deathangel2313. on 30 Sep 08, 14:22:40
All Alaskans,or just you?

who is going to ...
By: nef533. on 29 Sep 08, 15:30:23
who is going to drill OUR oil reserve when we decide we need the oil? lets assume your point is fact, what is the differnce? they are all gonna get tapped eventually.

That they've WANTED ...
By: Taranau. on 13 Aug 08, 06:02:11
That they've WANTED to drill there for years now,doesn't change WHY they want to drill there.And,that Clinton vetoed drilling there, in 1994,has nothing to do with that.They don't want to drill in ANWR,because Clinton said they couldn't.They want to drill in ANWR,because they don't own ANWR.And I don't need to know anything about Alaska,to know that that's the truth.Try actually arguing a point,not just argue.

taranau. Hate to ...
By: onlyoneak. on 13 Aug 08, 00:07:48
taranau. Hate to break it too ya,oil companies have wanted to develop ANWR for yrs, congress has voted it down over the yrs! However, in 19994,both house and senate passed it for drilling! Guess what? Clinton vetoed it!!! Look it up! "AND THATS THE TRUTH!PHTHTHT"! Typical uninformed lower 48er! Most of you haven,t a clue about ANWR,or Alaska! AND THATS THE TRUTH"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Whether you are pro ...
By: Taranau. on 09 Aug 08, 15:59:26
Whether you are pro or anti,about drilling in ANWR,the real truth about the oil companies wanting to drill there is this;ANWR is on public land.ANWR isn't just a wildlife refuge,it's a National Oil Reserve...OUR national oil reserve...The oil companies own plenty of land with oil underneath it,but they don't want to drill there,yet.They want to use up everybody elses oil first.THEN start selling us theirs...And THAT'S the truth.phththt!

I love when he says ...
By: skiingluke. on 02 Aug 08, 16:00:30
I love when he says, "we don't drill for oil and gas in the summertime"....Hahaha

There are two ...
By: caramarisa. on 30 Jul 08, 15:57:16
There are two different types of native peoples and one will benefit and one group's lifestyle would be hurt a lot. Besides drilling is a short term fix for the oil crisis and we need a long term fix that doesn't screw up the environment

the overwhelming ...
By: nef533. on 30 Jul 08, 15:17:49
the overwhelming majority of The native Alaskan people are for drilling anwr.

this made me laugh ...
By: kenkencat. on 30 Jul 08, 14:02:45
this made me laugh out loud, great video!

Right where they ...
By: caramarisa. on 29 Jul 08, 15:45:11
Right where they want to drill is where the caribou have their breeding grounds. The native Alaskan people depend on the caribou for food and other spiritual traditions. I'm not from Alaska and I know that. Oh and the point of living in America is that you do get an opinion so deal with it.

Libs are insane, ...
By: Silicondoc. on 14 Jul 08, 07:12:43
Libs are insane, there's really no hope until they are dead broke and starving, and don't have the strength to screech their lies. I'd say it's about $10 a gallon or maybe $15. That they want anyway since it will spur uneconomic, untenable, way to expensive, must be government subsidized "alternatibes" - that "don't exist" yet. I guess the libs are going to crack the oil mongers secret energy vault they've hid on us since TESLA... (libs are LOOOOOOOOONS ! )

It's good to hear ...
By: Reggie1971. on 06 Jul 08, 18:24:01
It's good to hear Senator Stevens cut through the mythology of the left on this issue. There simply is no rational argument not to drill in ANWAR.

Must See the TRUTH! ...
By: 2112beware. on 03 Jul 08, 02:17:43
Must See the TRUTH! watch?v=3xYGED1j65Y

monolithsappire! ...
By: onlyoneak. on 29 Jun 08, 19:51:30
monolithsappire! What are you talking about/ You read my post wrong/ I have lived up here the past 27 yrs, allover this state! I am For opening ANWR! I said the libtard fucks who live back east from some big city dont have a clue1 What dont you get? Dont insult my lontime Alaskan ass! And you live where? I live in Cordova know, lived in Anch, eagle river Chugiak,Seward,Kodiak,Petersburg,Wrangell,and that shithole capital Juneau! been a bearviewing guide,Fishing guide,flown allover AK! Talk shit!

I don't care ...
By: Novaessrussia. on 29 Jun 08, 02:27:52
I don't care weather or not it's wilderness! The wildlife might just want to move south or West. Drilling our own oil will lower gas prices and decrease our dependence on foreign nations.

Yes, Alaskans would ...
By: manheim2222. on 28 Jun 08, 22:04:29
Yes, Alaskans would get some of the money from the resources on our land. It just might help the people in rural communities who pay $7.00 a gallon for diesel or heating oil to keep themselves warm in the winter.

"With respect to ...
By: Diskwin. on 28 Jun 08, 06:42:09
"With respect to the world oil price impact, projected ANWR oil production constitutes between 0.4 and 1.2 percent of total world oil consumption in 2030, based on the low and high resource cases, respectively.1 Consequently, ANWR oil production is not projected to have a large impact on world oil prices." tinyurl 45oo56

Hmmm, I bet ...
By: darklordaragona. on 27 Jun 08, 23:41:06
Hmmm, I bet Alaskans will get double from the Oil companies if ANWR is drilled?

You people from ...
By: manheim2222. on 26 Jun 08, 07:18:15
You people from outside Alaska really don't have a clue. There are no fucking polar bears in the tiny sliver of ANWR that would be opened for drilling. Alaskans want to drill, and you douchebags from the lower 48 don't even deserve to have an opinion about it.

this video would be ...
By: freas0707. on 23 Jun 08, 01:52:02
this video would be worth the time if you used real pictures of ANWR...but you didn't you freakin fake enviro wacko...you guys can't win if you are honest so you LIE..get the real pics of this area...he knows what he is talking about...he is from there...you hate oil and love $4.50 a gallon...sickos

Bob Barr: Energy Policy & ANWR
Posted by: BobBarr2008

Video duration: 446 seconds
Global video hits: 4480

Bob chats over McCain and Obama's energy policies. We have the reserves, it's time to use them.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

John McCain is Big ...
By: itwaschris. on 03 Nov 08, 14:36:47
John McCain is Big Energy's Biotch and always has been. He started his career with money from Peabody Coal and wrote legislation after legislation to forcibly relocate the Navajo in Arizona and force them to live on a nuclear dump site. All so that Cindy's beer company could get a big contract with the Las Vegas casinos. McCain is establishment all the way. The only boundaries he goes outside of are the boudaries of human decency!

Barr is a Brilliant ...
By: 2connection. on 19 Sep 08, 04:16:16
Barr is a Brilliant man , theres no question about it ! He would dominate Obama and Mccain in a debate I WANT BOB BARR IN THOSE DEBATES, THIS IS MY COUNTRY TOO AND I DESERVE AS ALL AMERICANS DO TO HEAR THIS MANS MSSG HEAD TO HEAD AGAINST THE 2 PARTIES people dont just sit there, you gotta yell and scream , who the hell is anyone to tell you that "no WE will not allow you any choice in debates, you will get on your knees and accept what we give you, we own your minds " FIGHT

Whoa whoa whoa whoa ...
By: spacecake419. on 17 Sep 08, 04:51:49
Whoa whoa whoa whoa, are you kidding me? the REASON NOT TO DRILL ANYMORE is that we don't need oil from any source. There are so many other energy sources that lie untapped. Take the time to look into the technology hidden from us for years. And the obvious ones like Wind, Hydrogen, Solar, Pedal, Water. Driving oil prices back down will be passing up on the chance to start fixing one of our greatest mistakes.

Mr. Barr, the ...
By: padraicbg. on 21 Aug 08, 18:35:13
Mr. Barr, the reason we have not drilled off shore is because spills do happen. There are hundreds of oil well spills every year. The oil spilled after Katrina was almost as much as the 1969 California oil spill that brought about the ban in the first place. 44 oil rigs were sunk. We were fortunate that it stayed out in the Gulf. Why play Russian roulette with costal cities just to get enoungh oil that would be equal to raising the auto fuel standards by a mile per gallon.

Yeah, too bad Ron ...
By: Narrator007. on 23 Jul 08, 02:11:45
Yeah, too bad Ron Paul couldn't have been his running mate (impossible since the Libertarians nominate both Pres. and VP candidates at the same time, but one can dream. . .)

You mean true ...
By: hrdman2luv. on 18 Jul 08, 18:50:24
You mean true theocracy? Baldwin likes to mix his religion and politics too much. But I like his stance on the constitution. Except for the religous freedom. Bush destroyed my faith for christians. I just rely on my own christianity and beliefs in God. Libertarians keep religion and politics separate.

Bob Barr is the ...
By: Selina231. on 13 Jul 08, 01:56:11
Bob Barr is the lesser of three evils. I'm voting for Chuck Baldwin, a man of uncompromising, true integrity.

Interestingly ...
By: filmdude42. on 12 Jul 08, 03:37:13
Interestingly enough, if you know Barr, you know he's a big fan of Bob Marley, himself. :)

Bob Barr thinks ...
By: mhirtes12. on 12 Jul 08, 00:35:13
Bob Barr thinks that perverted sickos who make "crush videos" that show pets being tortured to death should be legal. That's one of the reasons why he lost his next election. SHAME on the Libertarian Party for embracing such a depraved little worm!

Wake-up America! ...
By: Randarch. on 08 Jul 08, 16:55:33
Wake-up America! Bob Barr is the best choice "We The People" have this election. If you want America to be great again, vote Barr.

I love how they ...
By: kjaegers123. on 08 Jul 08, 02:28:46
I love how they throw in some Marley to appeal to marijuana anti-prohibitionists. Finally somebody realizes how to rally the troops. Nice!

If Americans and ...
By: jibbi4one. on 08 Jul 08, 01:01:43
If Americans and their media would spend less energy disseminating the McCain/Obama 'pooh' on governance and concentrate on issues like what Paul/Barr raise like balanced energy policy with Nuclear+hydrocarbon+solar+wind would already have been an established energy policy norm in the U.S. All four energy sources are established technologies-what's keeping the U.S. from acting? Simple answer: the brand of a bloated and corrupt 2 party system it keeps as democratic.

The answer = Reduce ...
By: s3p2. on 07 Jul 08, 03:17:12
The answer = Reduce consumption using mass transportation, hybrids, biofuels, nuclear, wind,(a combination). Then drill here to supply our own oil and cut off the savages in the mid-east all together. Let them blow each other up and do whatever they want, and if we don't need them for oil.... Who cares?

We don't need to ...
By: nododon. on 06 Jul 08, 01:12:28
We don't need to drill. We have plenty of oil capped right on the North slope of Alaska at Prudoe Bay. Why isn't Barr talking about this? The reason we can't pump it out is because of the "deal" that Kissinger made with the Saudi's during the Carter Administration. The IMF and the World Bank screwed us. Barr is not telling the truth. Search youtube for the following title and get one hell of an education: Lindsey Williams

If they are not ...
By: espunde. on 05 Jul 08, 21:49:43
If they are not drilling on it there is a reason why. It is probably too expensive to do so, they not drilling because they just don't feel like it. You have to give companies the leeway to do business otherwise they get too scared and don't invest and develop. In the short run you would give tax breaks to encourage them, instead of windfall profits taxes like some are proposing (which would probably drive up the cost of gas even more).

If they are not ...
By: espunde. on 05 Jul 08, 21:45:14
If they are not drilling on it there is a reason why. It is probably too expensive to do so, they not drilling because they just don't feel like it. You have to give companies the leeway to do business otherwise they get too scared and don't invest and develop. In the short run you would give tax breaks to encourage them, instead of windfall profits taxes like some are proposing (which would probably drive up the cost of gas even more).

Let's drill!
By: MikeRestin. on 04 Jul 08, 23:52:17
Let's drill!

there isnt a lack ...
By: ParapaDrifter. on 03 Jul 08, 06:54:52
there isnt a lack of oil.... our dollar is just sinking. We have a lack of intelligence. Innovate god-damnit! Tap the zero point energyfield aka "dark energy"! Nikola Tesla did. The Hoover administration stole his patents!! Release the patents!!!!!!!! Free energy forever! The Zeropoint Energyfield is the glue that binds the universe. It links Gravity - Electricity -&- Magnetism

33 million acres of ...
By: bobby67401. on 03 Jul 08, 03:13:47
33 million acres of offshore areas already available to drill and not being drilled, why does the oil and gas industry need to have access to still more? The fact is that nearly 25 BILLION barrels of oil off the coast of the United States is currently available for drilling...and industry is not drilling it.

Jeez, you seem ...
By: LumpyRevolution. on 02 Jul 08, 03:57:26
Jeez, you seem angry. I hope you are not someone who considers himself a libertarian. I don't know any libertarian minded people who say that kind of stuff. Nasty language too. How does it make you feel to speak like that? Do you feel that it helps you make your point better and strengthens your mind? I post here because I'm exercising my right of free speech. Perhaps I'm a effing moron, but I'm sure glad I don't act like you. Thanks and good luck. :)

If you don't want ...
By: JosephtheLibertarian. on 02 Jul 08, 03:07:38
If you don't want to vote for him, why do you keep posting here? you fucking moron

Opening up ANWAR is ...
By: Quasifonix. on 02 Jul 08, 01:28:08
Opening up ANWAR is just more govt. intervention. At the most it's just a temporary fix to our energy problems. The demand for oil is rising globally. The Fed would have to force the oil companies drilling in ANWAR to sell only to US citizens versus selling to every buyer i.e. China and India. The true libertarian position is to just let the price rise due to increased demand until the market changes on its own and there is an afforable alternative developed to take oil's place.

ANWAR is too pretty ...
By: chambersburgbiker. on 01 Jul 08, 05:00:46
ANWAR is too pretty you imp. Get a hybrid, move closer to work, and stop pontificating.

Yeah the Oil ...
By: bakeshowdotus. on 01 Jul 08, 03:54:02
Yeah the Oil companies have lots of land they are not drilling on, thats because there isn't oil on that land. Oil isn't everywhere underneath the earth, only certain places and the places where the biggest reserves of oil exist are currently off limits. I'm sick of that democratic talking point, along with that B.S. that it will take us 10 years to get the oil. Are you kidding me, we went to the moon in less than ten years, we invented the atom bomb in 4 years, gimme a break.

If we drilled in ...
By: louiethegreater. on 01 Jul 08, 02:05:41
If we drilled in ANWR would the oil be used to lower domestic prices or global prices. How would it lower domestic prices?

An Alaskan Makes the Case for the Exploration of ANWR
Posted by: arcticpower

Video duration: 272 seconds
Global video hits: 4999

Inupiat Fenton Rexford breaks down the rationale for the exploration of a small part of ANWR from the perspective of an Alaskan.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Thank you for this ...
By: TuxLady. on 06 Aug 08, 07:57:44
Thank you for this informative video. I have supported drilling in ANWR since the 1990's. It's time to get going on this. The American people are in favor by a sizable majority, so it is time for the power-crazed, anti-democratic Democrats to bring this issue to a vote.

The lack of ...
By: VegasLoanRanger. on 26 Jul 08, 22:09:53
The lack of education is the rise of ignorance. Ignorance is plainly stating that you don't know. It sounds like you are the ignorant one. I don't mean to sound disrespectful, I am just making a statement. The Dems have our country under siege. They were elected by the People of the US. Our economy is suffering in a major way. It sounds as if you are ignorant to that fact. This is not to continue an "Addiction," as you put it. We are hostages to the Mid East. Can we say "NATIONAL SECURITY?"

oh so now because ...
By: swag909. on 17 Jul 08, 03:04:23
oh so now because somone disagrees with you noble opinion they are ignorant. the nature of the issue is that americans are getting massacared at the pumps every day and YOU want it to continue... i bet you have plenty of money tho dont you.

i will never ...
By: swag909. on 17 Jul 08, 03:01:40
i will never understand you people you say it will further our addiction so we need to stop it oilis not cocaine if you stop using cocaine you get healther and more motivated, if we stop using oil abruptly or let the gas prices continue to climb our economy is going to be crushed. enough people know americans want alternative energy when a sound solutions is found we the consumers will not hesitate. please use your heads what is wrong with helping the average american and creating jobs?

The lack of ...
By: Excalibur21371. on 16 Jul 08, 12:28:18
The lack of maturity in the commentor's statement indicates an unfortunate lack of understanding and ignorance in the true nature of the issue.

All we would ...
By: Excalibur21371. on 16 Jul 08, 12:25:46
All we would accomplish by more drilling (anywhere) is to further our "addiction to oil." It is false logic to engage in more drilling. It would just continue to enable our society into incorrect beliefs. We should TRUELY end our "addiction to oil" by investing the funds that would go toward drilling into other, more sustainable, areas of energy production. I wonder how much they paid the speaker and how much they (the oil companies) promise to pay the Inuit people of ANWR. Hmmmm.

how can a ...
By: mike1111qq. on 12 Jul 08, 08:24:46
how can a government so far away from the people that live there tell them what to do with there land.. alaskans sould sue...and win.. fuck the liberal fascist

Obviously you don't ...
By: astrea79. on 10 Jul 08, 20:09:29
Obviously you don't know much about oil drilling because 36 million barrels under the ground is not going to be drilled, refined, transfered and consumed in only five years. Oil is not a renewable resource, nobody is saying that, but it can serve as a temporary solution for the current energy crisis, plus the 1.2 trillion dollars in taxes oil companies have paid annually goes to tax breaks for renewable energy.

Thank you for ...
By: astrea79. on 10 Jul 08, 20:05:16
Thank you for educating users on ANWR and the Native Alaskan perspective on energy development near Indian land. I think too often it's skewed against development, when infact, if done correctly, it can be done for the benefit of Alaskans and all Americans.

"With respect to ...
By: Diskwin. on 28 Jun 08, 06:44:25
"With respect to the world oil price impact, projected ANWR oil production constitutes between 0.4 and 1.2 percent of total world oil consumption in 2030, based on the low and high resource cases, respectively.1 Consequently, ANWR oil production is not projected to have a large impact on world oil prices." tinyurl 45oo56

I have spent more ...
By: amigamaria001. on 16 Jun 08, 22:06:16
I have spent more than 30 years in Prudhoe Bay and surrounding areas - there is enough oil in ANWR to provide fuel for the USA for over 50 years. ANWR is so huge that if you took a pen and touch the map of ANWR the pen dot would cover more area than needed to drill. Americans in the lower 48 are so ignorant of the facts and prefer to stick to their ignorance rather than have the truth. Thank you for sharing the truth and the facts about ANWR on here!

Where does the ...
By: zupf. on 11 Jun 08, 23:45:05
Where does the gasoline in your car come from? Drill ANWR.

Hmm.. I don't ...
By: SaMeJ28. on 11 Jun 08, 18:23:21
Hmm.. I don't understand why you're fighting to open ANWR... There's 36 Billion barrels there... but the US oil consumption is 20 million/per day. At that rate, those reserves would be deplete in only 5 years. ...Then what?

Just some criticism ...
By: Joelomite. on 08 Jun 08, 04:48:24
Just some criticism of this video: some of the dialogue sounds jumbled as sentances are cut off by a new one beginning. Try to work out the audio. Very informative video, otherwise.

I wish more people ...
By: kjhesser. on 31 May 08, 21:10:36
I wish more people in our country understood econonomics. The oil companies in Alaska pay a huge tax to the state of Alaska and the US government to drill for oil. All those taxes are rolled into the price we pay for gas. Any company has to make a profit to stay in business, that's a fact. If you tax corporations you are taxing the person purchasing the product. That is us, folks. We are paying those hidden taxes when we buy the oil or gasoline. Then we pay additional fuel tax at the pump.

Although I do ...
By: pirucreek. on 16 May 08, 18:59:31
Although I do believe the native americans should get a piece of this oil. The truth is the oil belongs not to Alaskans or the oil companies but the American public. Bush and the republican are committing treason by giving the oil to the oil companies. As they don't release $ per barrel or % of barrel the US will receive. They are using the environment as smoke and mirrors.

It wouldn't be ...
By: CaribouSteak1. on 06 May 08, 03:11:33
It wouldn't be exported. Appreciate your comments but perhaps you should do additional homework after reading a 1995 press release from a radical environmental organization. Americans like you do nothing to solve the problem - you exacerbate it. No TV for you until you do your homework.

Great video. There ...
By: tryin2understand. on 05 May 08, 18:07:11
Great video. There you go. The people of Alaska are behind the idea and they are aware that their wildlife would be unharmed by drilling. But I guess the unavoidable tragedy is this: nothing whatsoever will EVER happen to change our energy dependence until these damn politicians (on BOTH sides of the aisle folks...not just big bad Bush) decide it is in THEIR interest to fix our oil dependency crisis. We all need to raise our voices until we are finally heard.

"Exactly how would ...
By: dafunkmonster. on 30 Apr 08, 07:15:26
"Exactly how would ANWR "fill our energy needs" when the oil drilled there is sent to China, India, and Japan?" You apparently don't understand why oil prices are high. Global demand for oil has risen while supply has remained constant. If the US drills for oil in ANWR, why should we keep it to ourselves? And we wouldn't just be "sending" it overseas, we'd be SELLING it. That's a good thing. It would cut down on our trade deficit, and increase the strength of the dollar. Go study economics

You forgot to ...
By: rangergranger. on 22 Apr 08, 18:26:16
You forgot to mention that every Alaskan resident looks forward to their annual welfare stipend check courtesy of the oil companies. You also forgot to mention that most of the oil obtained from ANWR wouldn't be sold within the USA; it would sold to the highest-bidding foreign nations. Exactly how would ANWR "fill our energy needs" when the oil drilled there is sent to China, India, and Japan?

Absolutely!
By: asmith629. on 22 Mar 08, 19:58:35
Absolutely!

I bet you would ...
By: darklordaragona. on 22 Mar 08, 16:39:58
I bet you would support oil Drilling in National parks and suburban areas

ANWR has about ...
By: asmith629. on 17 Feb 08, 01:42:33
ANWR has about 1,000 people visit annually. How many of you have been there? How many plan to visit? ANWR can give us the chance to break our dependance of oil and move to cleaner technologies. There are beautiful sights in ANWR, but there is also a lot of tundra and harsh land. The animal populations have also risen since drilling started in the Prudhoe bay area. EDUCATE yourselves on the issues people.

SELL OUT
By: drgibz. on 11 Feb 08, 21:55:03
SELL OUT

I love the comment ...
By: jpwade1. on 04 Jan 08, 10:28:36
I love the comment "Caribou gather around facilities to find relief from the Mosquito's" , what happened to the Mosquito's? .... Think about gas and canary's

Rep Young & Former ANWR Opponent Rep Bartlett Discuss HR6107
Posted by: RepDonYoung

Video duration: 138 seconds
Global video hits: 2996

Congressman Don Young speaks with Rep. Bartlett, about H.R. 6107, which would open ANWR and provide tens of billions of dollars for the development of a wide range of renewable and alternative energy sources. Rep. Bartlett, after historically opposing the opening of ANWR, helped Rep. Young introduce H.R. 6107.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Paul Stark at Alaska Press Conference RE ANWR
Posted by: starkforcongress

Video duration: 294 seconds
Global video hits: 380

Paul Stark speaks during a Press Conference after touring ANWR.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Rep. Don Young on ANWR and Gov. Sarah Palin
Posted by: RepDonYoung

Video duration: 34 seconds
Global video hits: 3837

Congressman Don Young speaks in support of Gov. Sarah Palin and her ability to help him open ANWR in 2009.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Sarah Palin Energy Policy
Posted by: EnergyInvestingNews

Video duration: 309 seconds
Global video hits: 9654

Alaska Governor Sarah Palin discusses energy policy, including oil and natural gas development in ANWR.
http://EnergyInve stingNews.org/

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Fucking Idiot.
By: Qwandu. on 30 Oct 08, 21:00:55
Fucking Idiot.

This woman is lying ...
By: clouddancer9875. on 13 Oct 08, 06:49:17
This woman is lying through her teeth. "we have trillions cubic feet of clean natural gas" LMAO! tell the American people why the USA already exports over 800bn cubic ft of Natural gas to foreign nations.

Unflagged fungible ...
By: DiggityDogg56. on 20 Sep 08, 16:42:11
Unflagged fungible oil molecules LOL! That was so much fun I've got to do it again. Unflagged fungible oil molecules Bwahahahaaa!

"fungible... ...
By: HryMuscle. on 20 Sep 08, 09:22:09
"fungible... molecules" ................... :-)

Alaska does not ...
By: volumptuous. on 20 Sep 08, 00:32:14
Alaska does not produce 20% of the US's "energy supply". Either Palin is a liar, or an idiot. I think it's both.

Also, the reason ...
By: mitsom. on 19 Sep 08, 14:14:49
Also, the reason why it doesn't get done is because the oil companies don't want to do it! It's too expensive and not cost effective. The issue is a complete red herring!

This woman doesn't ...
By: mitsom. on 19 Sep 08, 14:09:57
This woman doesn't even know the details of the energy policy in her own state. She told Gibson that Alaska produces 20% of the nations energy. The actual number is 3.5 PERCENT. So she was either engaged in a gross exaggeration or simply doesn't know wtf she is talking about!

Are polar bear and ...
By: franzy1. on 18 Sep 08, 23:35:50
Are polar bear and moose considered to be a fungible resource and can we track their molecules...?

She is absolutely ...
By: jfree1998. on 15 Sep 08, 16:11:57
She is absolutely correct, Obama and Biden are unrealistic in thinking we can turn our energy infrastructure around on a dime, we cannot, we need to drill, we need nuke, we need solar, wind and geothermal and we need to work on alternative fuels for cars and homeheating, but it has to be all of the above, or it wont' work.

I predict a future ...
By: sh4dyp. on 15 Sep 08, 05:40:03
I predict a future sex scandal between McCain and Palin lol

If Obama wins he ...
By: brainyidiot. on 15 Sep 08, 03:38:04
If Obama wins he should appoint her Secretary of the Interior.

Now we know why she ...
By: BagelsForever. on 14 Sep 08, 16:59:25
Now we know why she named her kid PIPEr.

she actually knows ...
By: weinerda. on 14 Sep 08, 00:08:10
she actually knows something about energy. that's why she seems more relaxed and natural. she knows nothing about foreign policy so she was nervous and she keep repeating talking points. her candidacy is an embarrassment to this country and the fact that people are buying her as even close to legitimate is even worse

she's sooo much ...
By: FrontPageStatuz. on 13 Sep 08, 23:55:38
she's sooo much nicer and different in this interview...the one with charlie gibson sounds shady...like she was nervous or she was reciting lines or something

It's just a way of ...
By: pinkbean2. on 13 Sep 08, 19:38:38
It's just a way of saying environmentally sustainable jobs...nothing fancy or misleading about that.

i wouldn't vote for ...
By: Plomomedia. on 13 Sep 08, 16:50:59
i wouldn't vote for this bitch if she gave me 100 blow jobs.

so if the snap was ...
By: PnisPumP. on 12 Sep 08, 07:59:55
so if the snap was 1 second long, obama biden plan is 5256000 times longer (ten years) i love how they do that little nature montage while shes trying to say its a barren land.

Btw, the "green ...
By: ChipProcessor32. on 12 Sep 08, 05:07:40
Btw, the "green collar jobs" that Obama refers to is a misnomer. As an engineer in thin films manufacturing, I can tell you that fabs consist of white collar engineers and blue collar techs. No different from Ford in the 70's, no different from paper mills, no different from any other manufacturing site. Don't be misled by fancy words.... But I'm still not voting for Palin.

However, national ...
By: ChipProcessor32. on 12 Sep 08, 05:01:22
However, national security as an argument for energy policy is weak. The threats that Russia, Iran, and NK pose have very little to do with non-renewable energy. This is where Palin glaringly shows her ignorance in foreign policy. This woman would encourage war against Russia and Pakistan (see the Charlie Gibson interview). That would only weaken America because we would borrow more money from China for weapons, while they increase their wealth and power. Her foreign policy would be disastrous.

I'm split on this ...
By: ChipProcessor32. on 12 Sep 08, 04:56:01
I'm split on this issue. To say that "green investment" brings "green collar jobs" is a lie. The field is so small that only researchers being funded by VCs in Silicon Valley can really advance "green technology". Biodiesel is not pragmatic because you would need huge plots of land to grow the corn needed for transformation. However, biodegradable polymers do show some promise, but their key synthesis derives from the run-off of biodiesel. In addition, oil drilling brings plenty of jobs.

ok yeah so if there ...
By: thegomez07. on 12 Sep 08, 03:47:42
ok yeah so if there is this so called "cost-free" for of energy , why hasnt the governement looked in to it? im sure they would be open to those ideas?

Yeah, oil cannot ...
By: ghiblix2. on 12 Sep 08, 02:30:30
Yeah, oil cannot even boast plastics anymore now that bioplastics completely own them. If oil does have one thing going for it, it's the ignorance that people like Sarah Palin would like to feed people for as long as possible.

OPEC just ...
By: GenXFuturist101. on 11 Sep 08, 19:35:27
OPEC just demonstrated precicely why even an unlimited supply of oil will not fix our "price problem". These prices, now established are considered "what the market will bear" & per profit motives & the "struggle factor" that this load creates on those dependent on this technology absolutely guarantee that oil will only become more and more expensive. Oil is done. It's over kids. Better alternatives are everywhere... just not legal in the U.S.A. YET.

This is perhaps the ...
By: zocurtis. on 11 Sep 08, 17:59:41
This is perhaps the most baised interview I have seen yet. She need to be put on O'Reilly so we can get the truth out of her.

This is perhaps the ...
By: zocurtis. on 11 Sep 08, 17:58:46
This is perhaps the most baised interview I have seen yet. She need to be put on O'Reilly so we can get the truth out of her.

ANWR question for Republican Debate
Posted by: tianshu55

Video duration: 15 seconds
Global video hits: 2409

For the CNN Republican Presidential Debate on 9/17/07

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

haha this is the ...
By: ShipRock04. on 22 Sep 08, 03:43:17
haha this is the best comment Ive ever heard. Hummers support terrorists. hahaha

Right on Brother. I ...
By: timmunozlasvegas. on 07 Aug 08, 23:13:06
Right on Brother. I couldn't have said it better myself.

Your left nut ...
By: optimusprimesqrt6. on 05 Aug 08, 20:58:14
Your left nut supports terrorists. It doesn't matter what you drive you still need oil as an energy source. It called FREEDOM.....we still have freedom to make choices. Don't tell me what YOU want me to drive you socialist prick. I will drive what I want. I pay for my fuel not you.

drill baby!
By: ajgolfer1. on 30 Jul 08, 07:02:57
drill baby!

2,000 acres. All we ...
By: ssbb8674. on 26 Jul 08, 01:40:44
2,000 acres. All we will do is put a few oil towers in 2,000 acres out of 17 million. We will then be able to reach 8 million acres underground. Results: oil prices down, and even if that doesn't work, until we go to more cleaner forms of energy like T. Boone Pickens wants, why should we give hundreds of billions of dollars away to foriegn nations every year???? Espically the ones whos citizens want us dead. Wake up America, post this comment on every ANWR video to make the truth be told.

Um...just drilling ...
By: ssbb8674. on 26 Jul 08, 01:40:24
Um...just drilling alone offcoast and in ANWR would create thousnads of jobs. Face it, the Dems have no argument here.

No one is saying ...
By: mattm1836. on 11 Jul 08, 00:48:26
No one is saying don't drive, just don't drive a hummer. Hummers support terrorists.

Then get off your ...
By: astrea79. on 10 Jul 08, 20:13:29
Then get off your computer and don't drive your car to work, better yet quit your job, your energy consumption is funding terrorists. Or atleast that's what your logic is saying.

Your right there is ...
By: joe0035. on 21 Jun 08, 05:38:09
Your right there is no oil shortage I guess everybody forgot we invaded Iraq which is full of oil. Arabia still enjoys selling us oil as well. We should get a guarantee if they drill there we pay under a $1 a gallon at pumps. Its our land our gas, we shouldn't need to make the guys rapeing us at the pumps any richer.

Anyone who still ...
By: ellislighthouse. on 15 Jun 08, 15:18:36
Anyone who still believes that global warming is going to kill us all is an idiot. All global warming theories have been proven wrong with actual data, the world is acting completely normal, let's just let it do it's thing. ANWR needs to be drilled. If anyone doesn't realize this, the process would not be that damaging since we have a lot of the facilities already there, plus, the alaskan pipeline is not that bad environmentaly, in fact, it was built around the enviroment. Liberas sheesh....

How about all of ...
By: rebel8of8life. on 10 Jun 08, 16:01:06
How about all of other resources food, cholthes, and JOBS how does drilling in ANWR help us there since most of that comes out of the U.S.A I'd wrather talk about jobs(Having MORE in the USA than out of it)and think about drifferent of ways of engery and leave the oil resvers alone.

DRILL ANWR!!! One ...
By: mikeusmc72. on 05 Jun 08, 15:56:10
DRILL ANWR!!! One half of one percent of the land would be affected and could yield 9-16 BILLIONS barrels! 75% of Alaskans support it and it's in their own backyard. Psycho environmental groups care more about one half of one percent of land than they do for the citizens living on the land. Drill ANWR, the continental shelf, and get the shale oil from the Rockies! Then in 10 years watch the Middle East cavemen wither away into obscurity.

The only goal of ...
By: pirucreek. on 16 May 08, 18:50:23
The only goal of CEO/Oil man Bush is to steal Alaskan oil for themselves. The environment is smoke and mirrors. Find out how many $ per barrel actually ends up with the American people.

Our lifestyle is ...
By: mattm1836. on 01 May 08, 01:01:30
Our lifestyle is killing this planet and needs to change. No drilling ever. Who do you think made the terrorists? Oil money bought their rockets and guns.

No drilling ever! ...
By: mattm1836. on 01 May 08, 01:00:32
No drilling ever! We need to quit being a bunch of spoiled children that prey on the Earth and maybe get out and walk once in a while and give up the green lawns and Hummers.

The oil companies ...
By: mattm1836. on 01 May 08, 00:59:38
The oil companies are a bunch of corrupt bastards who cafre nothing for human or animal life.

Go to hell redneck. ...
By: mattm1836. on 01 May 08, 00:59:04
Go to hell redneck. This whole "I'm an American Ican consume as much as I want"mentality is detroying the country and the rest of the planet with it. You are the enemy. Hummer drivers are the enemy. We will not allowed wilderness to be detroyed so a bunch of spoiled suburbanites and hicks can have more toys.

You are an idiot ...
By: cannonjoe98. on 30 Apr 08, 19:21:49
You are an idiot liberal, there is no proof to global warming, recent studies say we are cooling, and with technology now we only need 2,000 acres of ANWR to drill, this country needs to rely on its own resources, this would also create more jobs. There is also more oil off of the coast of Florida. We need to keep this country growing. Liberals are the enemy. They want to control the publics views, and freedoms, buy a Prius or else, it's my right as an American to buy a V8!!Hippie!

there is far more ...
By: wrx831. on 30 Apr 08, 09:00:24
there is far more than a years worth of supply! ANWR Is not the only place where there is oil in the U.S. We have plenty of oil but democrats won't let us touch it because they'd rather punish the oil companies and tell American people what they want to hear which is "New Technology"

I don't understand ...
By: GlobalSeeker. on 24 Apr 08, 00:45:24
I don't understand the sense in drilling in ANWR... At the current rate of oil consumption, not to mention consumption rising 2% a year, tapping into ANWR alone would only yield us 1.4 years of oil. It would be an insignificant amount of oil and a waste of a natural landscape. More importantly, as the permafrost thaws out due to global warming, it will likely be impossible to send the oil through pipelines without spillage.

Give up SUV's and ...
By: kstompaint. on 24 Feb 08, 14:58:57
Give up SUV's and leaf blowers and save the world! lol what a bunch of b.s.! You've been brainwashed by Al Gore and his selective "science." Tell yourself you're not a lib enough and you might actually start to believe it. When viable alternatives are available at reasonable prices, the market will buy them. Make an SUV that doesn't sacrifice size, safety or power running on something that doesn't use oil or make food more expensive and I'll be the first in line. Until then... we need to drill.

There were 2 ...
By: mattm1836. on 23 Feb 08, 20:15:48
There were 2 million acres of National Forest in 1906, now there are 417,000 acres. Where did they go? If we don't save what is left because there is "plenty" left, then when will we start to save it? There is not plenty left in the nation as a whole. If we give up the hummers, gas powered leaf blowers, and other nonsense, we can save it. I'm not a liberal, but you are a typical selfish conservative that only cares about his own comfort.

It's typical of a ...
By: kstompaint. on 23 Feb 08, 06:58:34
It's typical of a liberal to resort to emotional ploys when you have no ground to stand on. There is plenty of wilderness left and recovering our own national resources would only temporarily disturb a very small portion of it and "destroy" none.

So we should detroy ...
By: mattm1836. on 22 Feb 08, 21:11:04
So we should detroy what little is left of our wilderness and wildlife so we can guzzle more fuel and own more crap. That is not very patriotic. And I'll never get out of your way. I owe it to the children of America to defend their country from greedy, selfish bastards like yourself.

You're the ...
By: kstompaint. on 22 Feb 08, 19:30:58
You're the terrorist supporter. We have more than enough resources to maintain our lifestyle. If people like you would get the hell out of the way, we could stop buying foreign oil.

Jason Chaffetz and Sarah Palin Discuss ANWR
Posted by: jasonforcongress08

Video duration: 259 seconds
Global video hits: 629

Chaffetz and Palin at Press Conference after his fact finding mission to the Artic National Wildlife Refuge

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment